top of page
Human_Risk_Intro_Web.gif

โ€˜๐˜ ๐˜ธ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ๐˜ญ๐˜ฅ ๐˜ฉ๐˜ข๐˜ท๐˜ฆ ๐˜จ๐˜ฐ๐˜ต๐˜ต๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ ๐˜ข๐˜ธ๐˜ข๐˜บ ๐˜ธ๐˜ช๐˜ต๐˜ฉ ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ต๐˜ฐ๐˜ฐ, ๐˜ช๐˜ง ๐˜ช๐˜ต ๐˜ธ๐˜ฆ๐˜ณ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฏ'๐˜ต ๐˜ง๐˜ฐ๐˜ณ ๐˜บ๐˜ฐ๐˜ถ ๐˜ฎ๐˜ฆ๐˜ฅ๐˜ฅ๐˜ญ๐˜ช๐˜ฏ๐˜จ ๐˜ฌ๐˜ช๐˜ฅ๐˜ดโ€™ Compliance lessons from ๐—ฆ๐—ฐ๐—ผ๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐˜† ๐——๐—ผ๐—ผ.

Writer: Christian Hunt
Christian Hunt
4 days ago
1 min read

We design a policy, process, system or training programme and assume it should work. When it doesnโ€™t, the people using it are blamed for failing to follow the process, ignoring the training or just not doing what they were told.


But perhaps the protocol they failed to follow wasnโ€™t quite as brilliant as its designers thought.ย 



Compliance interventions arenโ€™t automatically good simply because their purpose is to reduce risk or ensure rules are followed. They can confuse people, irritate them, make their jobs harder or create so much friction that they look for ways around them. Push people too hard and they might even resist, because they feel theyโ€™ve been pushed too far.ย 


Whisper it, but we can actually make things worse. Not every training course helps people learn useful information and not every control mitigates risk.


That doesnโ€™t excuse people from responsibility or mean they should be free to do whatever they like. It just means that we have responsibilities too.


When something isnโ€™t working as designed, we should ask why. And we should be open to the possibility that the problem isnโ€™t those pesky employees; it might be us.

ย 
ย 
ย 

Comments


bottom of page