โ๐ ๐ธ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ต๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ข๐ธ๐ข๐บ ๐ธ๐ช๐ต๐ฉ ๐ช๐ต ๐ต๐ฐ๐ฐ, ๐ช๐ง ๐ช๐ต ๐ธ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏ'๐ต ๐ง๐ฐ๐ณ ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ ๐ฎ๐ฆ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ช๐ฏ๐จ ๐ฌ๐ช๐ฅ๐ดโ Compliance lessons from ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ผ๐ฏ๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ.
We design a policy, process, system or training programme and assume it should work. When it doesnโt, the people using it are blamed for failing to follow the process, ignoring the training or just not doing what they were told.
But perhaps the protocol they failed to follow wasnโt quite as brilliant as its designers thought.ย

Compliance interventions arenโt automatically good simply because their purpose is to reduce risk or ensure rules are followed. They can confuse people, irritate them, make their jobs harder or create so much friction that they look for ways around them. Push people too hard and they might even resist, because they feel theyโve been pushed too far.ย
Whisper it, but we can actually make things worse. Not every training course helps people learn useful information and not every control mitigates risk.
That doesnโt excuse people from responsibility or mean they should be free to do whatever they like. It just means that we have responsibilities too.
When something isnโt working as designed, we should ask why. And we should be open to the possibility that the problem isnโt those pesky employees; it might be us.




Comments