๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒโฆ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ถ๐บ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐ถ๐ด๐ป๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ถ๐? I have.
- Christian Hunt
- 12 minutes ago
- 2 min read
On Saturday, I wrote a post about oven clocks. (Yes, really.)
My point was that when the clocks go back โ like they did in Europe this weekend โ most people donโt bother changing the oven clock. Because it feels like hassle for no benefit.

That's a neat little behavioural reminder: if something seems pointless or awkward, weโre less likely to do it, even if we technically '๐ด๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ญ๐ฅ.'
I linked that idea to compliance: if a rule feels unnecessary or requires excess effort, people may well resist or ignore it. As I like to say: what we'd ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ people to do, and what theyโre ๐ญ๐ช๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ญ๐บ to do, arenโt always the same thing.
Feeling happy with that, I scheduled the post for Sunday morning, right after the clocks changed, at a time when posts like that usually do best.
Which is when it hit me. In a post about clocks not updating, Iโd forgotten the most important one of all: ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ธ. ๐คโฐ
Yes, the clocks had officially changed. But people wouldnโt be ๐ข๐ค๐ต๐ช๐ฏ๐จ like it yet; theyโd still be on summer time.
Iโd focused on the time on the scheduler, not the state of the people I wanted to reach.
Luckily, I '๐ค๐ญ๐ฐ๐ค๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ฅ' it in time, brought the post forward an hour and It landed well.
It's here if you want to read it, though be warned, one person did describe it as '๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ณ๐ช๐ฃ๐ญ๐บ ๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐ธ๐ฆ๐ฅ':ย https://lnkd.in/d4VRPsFV?
Now the timing might not have made a big difference, but the irony stayed with me.
๐๐โ๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ถ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฎ๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฉ๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ผ๐โ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ. Because we're far better at seeing things through our perspective, not theirs.ย




Comments